Do what's natural. What did I say! Hmmm...From your perspective. Do what your conscience tells you, not your body or defensive mechanisms.
Do Good. Be Good. Stay away from negatives. It will help.
Friday, February 2, 2007
Medium?
I told you to stop calling me an antenna. I agree, I am in some ways. I think I can't go and come. But I sure "see" good. I really like that one. For some reason.
Okay. So does God. God really likes that one.
Okay. So does God. God really likes that one.
Shit!
I may not be able to have sex anymore. It would be like doing it to "myself". Shit!
Maybe not. Who knows. I might be crazy. Be a relief!
I knew it! God, give it back. What? You know. My desire for sex! I think I see better. I won't go blind. I promise.
Maybe not. Who knows. I might be crazy. Be a relief!
I knew it! God, give it back. What? You know. My desire for sex! I think I see better. I won't go blind. I promise.
Good Article
http://www.survivalafterdeath.org/articles/kelly/personality.htm
What is Proof of Personality and its Persistence in this Life?
- M. Kelly -
.....This has brought philosophy into such contempt that many have forgotten that there was such a man as Kant, and that he revolutionised philosophy 126 years ago by conclusively proving in his Transcendental Aesthetik that our empirical knowledge depends on the forms of time and space, a priori existing in our intellect, time being the form of the inner sense and space that of the outer. At one blow he upset the dogmatic idealism of Berkeley and the sceptical of Des Cartes by showing that inner experience, which the latter looked upon as the only certainty, could not be possible without the existence of external objects.Some English writers on metaphysics, completely ignoring Kant's arguments, still look upon objects in space as realities in themselves, and endeavour to show how we derive the ideas of time, space, and causality from them, never thinking to ask themselves how on earth they could get any knowledge of an external object, to begin with, if these forms did not already exist preformed in their brains.
What is Proof of Personality and its Persistence in this Life?
- M. Kelly -
.....This has brought philosophy into such contempt that many have forgotten that there was such a man as Kant, and that he revolutionised philosophy 126 years ago by conclusively proving in his Transcendental Aesthetik that our empirical knowledge depends on the forms of time and space, a priori existing in our intellect, time being the form of the inner sense and space that of the outer. At one blow he upset the dogmatic idealism of Berkeley and the sceptical of Des Cartes by showing that inner experience, which the latter looked upon as the only certainty, could not be possible without the existence of external objects.Some English writers on metaphysics, completely ignoring Kant's arguments, still look upon objects in space as realities in themselves, and endeavour to show how we derive the ideas of time, space, and causality from them, never thinking to ask themselves how on earth they could get any knowledge of an external object, to begin with, if these forms did not already exist preformed in their brains.
More Proof
Lloyd Pye says that the proponents of "Intelligent Design" cannot explain the anomalies between species which he describes [9/04]. He certainly provides some interesting information, much of which is new to us, but he is quite wrong in his dismissal of our alternative explanation.
This arose from a highly successful but suppressed attempt to solve a group of problems in cosmology. Theorists cannot switch off their 'Big Bang', so it remains as an embarrassing problem called the 'cosmological constant' which totally invalidates all the scenarios they present.
Then some stars seem older than the universe and gravity cannot be properly incorporated. We not only solved all these problems before 1990, but predicted that the expansion of the universe must be ever accelerating-something not discovered until 1998. The solution involved the introduction of "opposed energy dynamics", which shows that when an invisible background medium made of a mixture of minute particles exists, some made of positive and the remainder of negative energy, then creative properties appear from the mathematics. A structure very similar to the neural network of our brains appears.
Though unimaginably fine grained, this extends to the very edges of the universe. It has that potential to evolve a conscious intelligence and appears able to have created matter by the deliberate organisation of the waves it spontaneously generates.
Evolution has certainly occurred, but now seems more likely to have been like that of our cars: by the repeated design of new models based on experience of older ones. On this basis, the anomalies described by Pye become explicable without invoking aliens from outer space. The references on our website are backed by peer-reviewed scientific publications; see our website at http://www.survivalafterdeath.org.
Ronald D. Pearson, BSc
Bath, England, UK AUGUST-SEPTEMBER 2OO2
This arose from a highly successful but suppressed attempt to solve a group of problems in cosmology. Theorists cannot switch off their 'Big Bang', so it remains as an embarrassing problem called the 'cosmological constant' which totally invalidates all the scenarios they present.
Then some stars seem older than the universe and gravity cannot be properly incorporated. We not only solved all these problems before 1990, but predicted that the expansion of the universe must be ever accelerating-something not discovered until 1998. The solution involved the introduction of "opposed energy dynamics", which shows that when an invisible background medium made of a mixture of minute particles exists, some made of positive and the remainder of negative energy, then creative properties appear from the mathematics. A structure very similar to the neural network of our brains appears.
Though unimaginably fine grained, this extends to the very edges of the universe. It has that potential to evolve a conscious intelligence and appears able to have created matter by the deliberate organisation of the waves it spontaneously generates.
Evolution has certainly occurred, but now seems more likely to have been like that of our cars: by the repeated design of new models based on experience of older ones. On this basis, the anomalies described by Pye become explicable without invoking aliens from outer space. The references on our website are backed by peer-reviewed scientific publications; see our website at http://www.survivalafterdeath.org.
Ronald D. Pearson, BSc
Bath, England, UK AUGUST-SEPTEMBER 2OO2
More
Lloyd Pye says that the proponents of "Intelligent Design" cannot explain the anomalies between species which he describes [9/04]. He certainly provides some interesting information, much of which is new to us, but he is quite wrong in his dismissal of our alternative explanation.
This arose from a highly successful but suppressed attempt to solve a group of problems in cosmology. Theorists cannot switch off their 'Big Bang', so it remains as an embarrassing problem called the 'cosmological constant' which totally invalidates all the scenarios they present.
Then some stars seem older than the universe and gravity cannot be properly incorporated. We not only solved all these problems before 1990, but predicted that the expansion of the universe must be ever accelerating-something not discovered until 1998. The solution involved the introduction of "opposed energy dynamics", which shows that when an invisible background medium made of a mixture of minute particles exists, some made of positive and the remainder of negative energy, then creative properties appear from the mathematics. A structure very similar to the neural network of our brains appears.
Though unimaginably fine grained, this extends to the very edges of the universe. It has that potential to evolve a conscious intelligence and appears able to have created matter by the deliberate organisation of the waves it spontaneously generates.
Evolution has certainly occurred, but now seems more likely to have been like that of our cars: by the repeated design of new models based on experience of older ones. On this basis, the anomalies described by Pye become explicable without invoking aliens from outer space. The references on our website are backed by peer-reviewed scientific publications; see our website at http://www.survivalafterdeath.org.
Ronald D. Pearson, BSc
Bath, England, UK AUGUST-SEPTEMBER 2OO2
This arose from a highly successful but suppressed attempt to solve a group of problems in cosmology. Theorists cannot switch off their 'Big Bang', so it remains as an embarrassing problem called the 'cosmological constant' which totally invalidates all the scenarios they present.
Then some stars seem older than the universe and gravity cannot be properly incorporated. We not only solved all these problems before 1990, but predicted that the expansion of the universe must be ever accelerating-something not discovered until 1998. The solution involved the introduction of "opposed energy dynamics", which shows that when an invisible background medium made of a mixture of minute particles exists, some made of positive and the remainder of negative energy, then creative properties appear from the mathematics. A structure very similar to the neural network of our brains appears.
Though unimaginably fine grained, this extends to the very edges of the universe. It has that potential to evolve a conscious intelligence and appears able to have created matter by the deliberate organisation of the waves it spontaneously generates.
Evolution has certainly occurred, but now seems more likely to have been like that of our cars: by the repeated design of new models based on experience of older ones. On this basis, the anomalies described by Pye become explicable without invoking aliens from outer space. The references on our website are backed by peer-reviewed scientific publications; see our website at http://www.survivalafterdeath.org.
Ronald D. Pearson, BSc
Bath, England, UK AUGUST-SEPTEMBER 2OO2